Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 52(5): e97-e104, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23023864

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in dispensing errors within community telepharmacy practices by comparing error rates across central sites (community telepharmacy sites with pharmacists present) and the corresponding remote sites, which are staffed by registered technicians and overseen by the central site pharmacist. DESIGN: Cross-sectional pilot study with a test group (remote sites) and comparison group (central sites). SETTING: 24 rural community telepharmacies (14 remote sites and 10 central sites). PARTICIPANTS: Pharmacy staff. INTERVENTION: The Pharmacy Quality Commitment (PQC) reporting system was integrated into the North Dakota Telepharmacy Project and used to track dispensing errors over a 45-month period. Both pharmacists and pharmacy technicians were trained on the use of the PQC system. The PQC system focused on two quality-related events (QREs): a "near miss" (i.e., a mistake discovered by the pharmacy staff before a medication reaches the patient) and an "error" (i.e., a mistake discovered after the patient leaves the pharmacy with the medication). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The distribution of QREs across central and remote sites. RESULTS: The remote (central) telepharmacy group reported 47,078 (62,480) prescriptions and a QRE rate of 1.34% (1.43%). QREs at the remote sites were more likely than at the central sites to be caught at the final pharmacist check (58.2% vs. 40.8%, P < 0.01) and less likely to be caught by the patient (0.17% vs. 0.28%, P < 0.01). Remote sites were more likely to include incorrect directions (18.9% vs. 13.4%, P = 0.01) in the medication entry process. CONCLUSION: QRE rates for remote site and central site telepharmacies were consistent with each other and with national estimates in traditional community pharmacies. However, significant differences between central and remote sites existed based on how QREs arose and how they were caught. Pharmacists must recognize this fact and use diligence when working in a telepharmacy setting.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/estadística & datos numéricos , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/organización & administración , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Errores de Medicación/clasificación , Proyectos Piloto , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Servicios de Salud Rural/organización & administración , Telemedicina/organización & administración
2.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 51(5): 580-90, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21896455

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the differences in medication dispensing errors between remote telepharmacy sites (pharmacist not physically present) and standard community pharmacy sites (pharmacist physically present and no telepharmacy technology; comparison group). DESIGN: Pilot, cross-sectional, comparison study. SETTING: North Dakota from January 2005 to September 2008. PARTICIPANTS: Pharmacy staff at 14 remote telepharmacy sites and 8 comparison community pharmacies. INTERVENTION: The Pharmacy Quality Commitment (PQC) reporting system was incorporated into the North Dakota Telepharmacy Project. A session was conducted to train pharmacists and technicians on use of the PQC system. A quality-related event (QRE) was defined as either a near miss (i.e., mistake caught before reaching patient; pharmacy discovery), or an error (i.e., mistake discovered after patient received medication; patient discovery). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: QREs for prescriptions. RESULTS: During a 45-month period, the remote telepharmacy group reported 47,078 prescriptions and 631 QREs compared with 123,346 prescriptions and 1,002 QREs in the standard pharmacy group. Results for near misses (pharmacy discovery) and errors (patient discovery) for the remote and comparison sites were 553 and 887 and 78 and 125, respectively. Percentage of "where the mistake was caught" (i.e., pharmacist check) for the remote and comparison sites were 58% and 69%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study reported a lower overall rate (1.0%) and a slight difference in medication dispensing error rates between remote telepharmacy sites (1.3%) and comparison sites (0.8%). Both rates are comparable with nationally reported levels (1.7% error rate for 50 pharmacies).


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/normas , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/normas , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/organización & administración , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , North Dakota , Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Farmacéuticos/normas , Técnicos de Farmacia/organización & administración , Técnicos de Farmacia/normas , Proyectos Piloto , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/organización & administración
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...